Arcticdude
Top Poster
Wait a minute Tex. Why Alaska? Doesn't Texas have any islands?Hysterical. Note that I left 5% of welfare in place. I think there is a small portion of welfare recipients who truly are incapable of caring for themselves. I don't know the number, 5%, 10%? But small. I'm fine with helping them to live with dignity. Note that this does NOT include nuts who took drugs and made themselves vegetables: I see no reason to keep them alive.
One problem is that no country would take the Trash. So I'll ask to change the title. Instead let's take a nice island off Alaska, one with LOTS of big hungry bears. For these Trash, if no other country will take them, we drop them off on the island, butt naked. So the new operation name would be: FEED THE BEARS. Short, simple, clear. Their last act on earth might be the only good thing they'll ever do... I only wonder if Al Gore would approve of this as it's a way of supporting 'nature'?
Even 5-10% is too much. Let the charities feed them if the want. But no tax payer should be ever be forced to feed anyone that can't or won't work. Remember, welfare started out as a "safety net" to keep people from starving. Now look at it. It's become a lifestyle for millions of losers. All government programs start out small, and sound worthwhile, but they all turn in to huge uncontrollable monsters.