huYeah, I understand, this is the wrong audience in general.
But like you all, I have primary storage. But I also think it would be smart to have a 2nd plan.
When disaster hits, the reality is farmers have surplus, and city people are starving (e.g. Bolshevik Revolution ), because no one is buying, so not sure how 10,000 years of food storage would benfit me.
All those underground bunkers companies aren't much better either because they all have a limited food supply.
Urban farms and storage are among the riskiest ideas out there. Gangs are likely to go door to door.
This is not a govt. program. In fact, maybe should set it up as a coop. You own the food. It would be there 24x7x365.
Yes, I am aware of the clause, which also states things like controlling all labor, and probably conscription:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2012-03-22/pdf/2012-7019.pdf
and the history of govt property grabs is documented:
independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=48
Anyways, no point in beating a dead horse, so here's another angle:
What about selling plots of farmland (e.g. 0.25 acre), since that would seem to feed about one person (but number is based on large scale ag. methods); but legally its unfeasible to just subdivide farms like that, so maybe selling it more as a farm land rental makes sense. E.g. reserve 1/4 acre of land for $100/mo. Exact acreage depends completely on the farm land productivity, but you get the idea. Additionally, for higher amount, you would get each years crop sent to you as well.
Is this a better idea?
Then maybe even add a shelter with micro-beds (e.g. like Japanese capsule hotel).
So, really no good safety solutions, unless you are in the Alaskan wilderness.
But like you all, I have primary storage. But I also think it would be smart to have a 2nd plan.
When disaster hits, the reality is farmers have surplus, and city people are starving (e.g. Bolshevik Revolution ), because no one is buying, so not sure how 10,000 years of food storage would benfit me.
All those underground bunkers companies aren't much better either because they all have a limited food supply.
Urban farms and storage are among the riskiest ideas out there. Gangs are likely to go door to door.
This is not a govt. program. In fact, maybe should set it up as a coop. You own the food. It would be there 24x7x365.
Yes, I am aware of the clause, which also states things like controlling all labor, and probably conscription:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2012-03-22/pdf/2012-7019.pdf
and the history of govt property grabs is documented:
independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=48
Anyways, no point in beating a dead horse, so here's another angle:
What about selling plots of farmland (e.g. 0.25 acre), since that would seem to feed about one person (but number is based on large scale ag. methods); but legally its unfeasible to just subdivide farms like that, so maybe selling it more as a farm land rental makes sense. E.g. reserve 1/4 acre of land for $100/mo. Exact acreage depends completely on the farm land productivity, but you get the idea. Additionally, for higher amount, you would get each years crop sent to you as well.
Is this a better idea?
Then maybe even add a shelter with micro-beds (e.g. like Japanese capsule hotel).
So, really no good safety solutions, unless you are in the Alaskan wilderness.