yeah,,,,,,,,,,,,California,,,when they succeed from the USA,,,,that will be a good day
Freedom of speech is a thing of the past
- Thread starter grayghost668
- Start date
Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:
jimLE
A True Doomsday Prepper
i admit and agree that everyone is racist,at least to a degree..but why take it out on others?
don't you mean politically correct,,,,,,bend to the will of the few,never say what you are really thinking,,,,,not me jim,,,,,being politically correct is killing this country,,,,
look at what is going on right now with all the monuments to men like Robert E lee the southern Flag we have to appease the Blacks,kiss up to them and be politically correct,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,HOGWASH
don't you mean politically correct,,,,,,bend to the will of the few,never say what you are really thinking,,,,,not me jim,,,,,being politically correct is killing this country,,,,
look at what is going on right now with all the monuments to men like Robert E lee the southern Flag we have to appease the Blacks,kiss up to them and be politically correct,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,HOGWASH
DANG,,,,,,,,,,,,DOUBLE POST
oh well,,,I can not do anything about this crap,,,,,I can complain speak my piece express my opinion but in the end the few will win,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and that is a sad fact,,,we have become to civilized to stand up and simply say NO
At the end of the day its just another one of many excuses. When people are pissed off or dissatisfied in life...its far easier to redirect those unpleasant feelings...particularly onto those whom appear/think "differently". I've done it many times myself.
Green is the only color that matters in this country. This other stuff is for the birds.
People should focus on bettering themselves more and complaining about others less. They would be much better off in the long hall. Easier said than done however.
Last edited:
jimLE
A True Doomsday Prepper
nope.to me,not making racist comments and/or what ever,is not only a show of respect towards others.but it's also a show of self respect as well..
Arcticdude
Top Poster
To me there is nothing wrong with being "racist". It's just how one acts on their feelings that could be bad. Also the term "racist" is thrown around so much now days it doesn't mean anything. And it's generally only the Whites who get scared when called racist.
you have to earn my respect,,and if someone doesn't like me,,,well that is their problem not mine
Danil54grl
Top Poster
@grayghost668 Your words are coming true in Canada. They will try that here too if we don't get the Dems out of office in November.
The Trudeau regime has introduced an Orwellian new law called the Online Harms Bill C-63, which will give police the power to retroactively search the Internet for ‘hate speech’ violations and arrest offenders, even if the offence occurred before the law existed.This new bill is aimed at safeguarding the masses from so-called “hate speech.”http://Revolver.news reports: The real shocker in this bill is the alarming retroactive aspect. Essentially, whatever you’ve said in the past can now be weaponized against you by today’s draconian standards. Historian Dr. Muriel Blaive has weighed in on this draconian law, labeling it outright “mad.” She points out how it literally spits in the face of all Western legal traditions, especially the one about only being punished if you infringed on a law that was valid at the time of committing a crime.https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/canada-to-imprison-anyone-who-has-ever-posted-hate-speech-online/
The Trudeau regime has introduced an Orwellian new law called the Online Harms Bill C-63, which will give police the power to retroactively search the Internet for ‘hate speech’ violations and arrest offenders, even if the offence occurred before the law existed.This new bill is aimed at safeguarding the masses from so-called “hate speech.”http://Revolver.news reports: The real shocker in this bill is the alarming retroactive aspect. Essentially, whatever you’ve said in the past can now be weaponized against you by today’s draconian standards. Historian Dr. Muriel Blaive has weighed in on this draconian law, labeling it outright “mad.” She points out how it literally spits in the face of all Western legal traditions, especially the one about only being punished if you infringed on a law that was valid at the time of committing a crime.https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/canada-to-imprison-anyone-who-has-ever-posted-hate-speech-online/
That would be an "ex post facto" law and is unconstitutional in the U.S. and in Canada.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-12.html
Section 2 Fundamental Freedoms
2 Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
Section 11 Proceedings in criminal and penal matters
11 Any person charged with an offence has the right
(g) not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations;
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-12.html
Section 2 Fundamental Freedoms
2 Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
Section 11 Proceedings in criminal and penal matters
11 Any person charged with an offence has the right
(g) not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations;
Since when do these criminal governments follow Constitutions or Laws they don't agree with?
They don't, I'm just pointing out precisely how they are blatantly violating the Canadian Constitution.
Speech is one thing, which they could argue is somehow dangerous to society, but passing an Ex Post Facto law is unequivocally unconstitutional. They might as well throw away their constitution at that point.
Speech is one thing, which they could argue is somehow dangerous to society, but passing an Ex Post Facto law is unequivocally unconstitutional. They might as well throw away their constitution at that point.
I have to say, if the Canadian people allow this tyranny, they deserve everything they will get. There is always a point in which a people stand up and say NO…or they turn into slaves. This is their point of no return.
