Haha he implicated Soros which leads directly back to HRC, BLM, Bernie protests, etc. I love it.
It was something that gazrok said (the best buddies thing)It's not really "Trump's DOJ" yet. Still a lot of holdovers from the Obama Administration trying to sabotage him. Trump has voiced his disapproval over "his DOJ" numerous times. We call them the "Deep State." Google it. Sessions has a tough job trying to "herd cats", so to speak. And when did you get the idea that the U.S. and Russia are "best buddies"? I see no evidence whatsoever of that.
Looks like the republicans are eating their own today with all the criticism of the summit in Helsinki. Even Ryan is highly critical as well as several others.Trump was not my 1st, 2nd or 3rd choice, but the man has balls bigger than softballs.
He stood at the presser and asks about the servers, emails etc.
The Left are eating their own.
Looks like the republicans are eating their own today with all the criticism of the summit in Helsinki. Even Ryan is highly critical as well as several others.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It wasn’t just Ryan. Graham. McCain. Flake. McConnell. Romney. Hurd. LoBiondo. Ros-Lehtinen. Burr. Cornyn. Kinzinger. Sasse. Amash. Brennan. Steele. Abby Huntsman. All are decidedly not left or Democrats.Conservatives don't like Ryan and want him gone now. He has always been against anything Trump does. Not a good example.
Have you noticed the Left isn't mentioning the $400 million HRC received? And the ones yelling the loudest like Brennan is up to his eyes in trouble.
The truth will out.
Just all progressives.It wasn’t just Ryan. Graham. McCain. Flake. McConnell. Romney. Hurd. LoBiondo. Ros-Lehtinen. Burr. Cornyn. Kinzinger. Sasse. Amash. Brennan. Steele. Abby Huntsman. All are decidedly not left or Democrats.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
We are fed up with the establishment, I agree. It is just that trump keeps putting establishment in places of power...Doreena, you just don't get it do you? The Washington establishment, both "D" and "R", has been against Trump from the start. And that is why he won. Americans are fed up with the establishment.
Exactly. I was thinking this AM that even if people are suspicious of the US intelligence agencies, why would they place more trust in Russian ones?Sorry guys, trump is completely outsmarted and out classed by Putin. For him to go against all of our intelligence agencies for Putin’s denial he has to be naive at best or blackmailed at worst. Can anyone here seriously believe putin didn’t intentionally help him win?
the Russians,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,funny our agencies have covered up everything Clinton did,,,,,,the Russians made it public knowledge all the under handed crap Clinton had done over the years ,and the Democrats have been screaming collusion ever since ,but maybe the Russians just like many here in the USA were worried about what Clinton would do if elected,,,,,Exactly. I was thinking this AM that even if people are suspicious of the US intelligence agencies, why would they place more trust in Russian ones?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Absolutely right about skewed results, you can interpret a research project any way you want. There are tricks to it. That is why knowing how to read research for yourself and to know how to determine what is good and bad results, how it is done, sample sizes, and all the other things about it. Do not rely on someone elses interpretation of it. AND the media always puts their own spin on it. That is why some say, coffee is good for you and coffee is bad for you, eggs are healthy, eggs aren't healthy, the research is all the same, it is how you interpret it to others who don't know what the heck they are reading, they just believe what they are told. I used to be the same way until I took on research studies in college and it was a real eye opener!!Exactly.
I really wish we'd make Stats a mandatory class in High School. Because ANYONE who has taken a semester or two of it, will never be fooled by BS statistics again.
There's a reason stats are called "lies, damn lies".
Because given nearly ANY data set, a statistician can then determine what data to include/exclude (i.e. cherry pick) and whatever statistical analysis method they wish to use....to then generate a stat that supports one view or the other...and all with the same starting data set.
So, you then come to realize that unless you know all of the parameters of the data yourself, and do your OWN analysis of it, you are getting a SKEWED result, to serve whatever agenda is paying for the statistician's time.
How do you think all the news networks were so fooled and blinded during the 2016 election? From those stats (polls), it was made to make Hillary appear to have had it in the bag. Funny enough, this blatant propaganda backfired, keeping folks home instead of coming to the polls. So we, the public, have SEEN just how easily stats can be skewed, right in front of our faces, and yet we (as a whole) continue to be blinded by them.
It's actually kind of mind-boggling that ANYONE believes a poll anymore.
I found an article by researchers that traced the money and that this claim was false. About 125000 went to Hillary and maybe 1 m to the Democratic Party. The only claimants were not valid sources that are not vetted.I want to hear more about the $400m that went to HRC.
I'm not hearing about it on MSM. I'm shocked. Lol
Plus, an idiot Congressman from Memphis should be ousted for inciting a coup. He has embarrassed TN for years.
I am pretty sure that you will not like this link, but please provide me a link with a decent reputation.
Plus, an idiot Congressman from Memphis should be ousted for inciting a coup. He has embarrassed TN for years.
maybe the Russians just like many here in the USA were worried about what Clinton would do if elected
Enter your email address to join: