Secret life of a Leftist prepper
- Thread starter Silent Earth
- Start date
Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:
Smoking, overweight playing doctor in 'rumble in the streets' um, ya
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 18,155
Hey Lady! (if that is the right word LOL)
Preppers don't go out looking for trouble, mindlessly destroying other people's property, and taunting police, dimwit.
Preppers don't go out looking for trouble, mindlessly destroying other people's property, and taunting police, dimwit.
And so you write an article to prove our point!
If that is what leftist preppers have to offer I think their extinction is certified.
Lost my interest and lunch when she (?) started talking about her being naked and having sex. Gross! 150 pounds (minimum) over weight. Critical items are extra smokes? Yeah, if she is the best they have to offer, they are toast.
Anarchists are not preppers(despite what I said earlier) sure they might "scavenge" some stuff and that one might have a few first aid items, but get into a confrontation with police and your always going to come off worst.
like someone else said, preppers don't go looking for trouble, if trouble comes we deal with it but we don't go looking for it, I know I don't.
like someone else said, preppers don't go looking for trouble, if trouble comes we deal with it but we don't go looking for it, I know I don't.
She was really good at painting a picture to make us right wing gun toting doomsday preppers look crazy. But then the more she described herself and if you really think about the unity that could be obtained they sound completely nuts. As I was reading I was thinking wow, maybe prepping will lead this far left nut a bit more right as she realizes the need for guns for self defense. While there was some mention of gun...nope, I don't think there is hope for her lol. Take a look at that slingshot eh!
When the "big one" finally does happen, an army of left wing libtards resembling a gang like antifa will be bugging out of the city led by this lady with her purple slingshot going to farms for free hand outs! OOOOO....Beware!
No really though, though they are against guns as far left they buy them themselves. Never underestimate a potential threat. Also note that these types are more prone to unity than we are. Not saying that we can't get along, we are less apt to form a group of substantial enough size to fight off a large force like you see in some EMP novels. Lack of unity is the Rights biggest weekness.
No really though, though they are against guns as far left they buy them themselves. Never underestimate a potential threat. Also note that these types are more prone to unity than we are. Not saying that we can't get along, we are less apt to form a group of substantial enough size to fight off a large force like you see in some EMP novels. Lack of unity is the Rights biggest weekness.
Yeah I know and that is generally what we all believe including myself. But people do survive and there is a possibility. We as preppers can not get to rigid in what we conclude. Many people force themselves to believe things that make them feel safer and we as preppers have to at least admit to possibilities.
This reminds of a video I saw a month ago. Envirowackos parked a van blocking an interception in DC. One of them was laying on top of it. Police told the tow driver to hitch up & go. He back up, hiked up the rear axle, and started rolling. The lefties went nuts. "You can't do that!" "That's not safe!" "There's a person on there!" And yet, the tow driver just went merrily down the road.
Same thing here. Leftie Antifa gangs will head up with banners & pipes. They'll be wiped out at the second house they come to. They'd be yelling how unfair it is as they bleed out.
It won't be an issue of unity. If one person is fighting with another person, and they see a pack of zombies (Antifa) coming, they'll end their quarrel and take out the zombies. With other people, at least there is some sense of intelligent negotiations. With Antifa, just put them out of our misery and move on.
If SHTF, something like an EMP happens, there are a number of people who know me who will try to join our group. Freeloading liberals. I know them, I didn't say we're friends. They'll be turned away at the gate or eat lead, not my problem. I'm fine turning them into dog food. They bring no skills and no stores, I won't be running a charity in those times.
Even sniveling liberal sheeple can turn into snarling feral dog packs. I never discount anybodies potential for violence. Fanatics of any kind are dangerous, even green peace fanatics. In times of disaster, they can and will convince themselves they are more important than your or your family, simply because they represent a just cause and a better future for the world.
UP, that is true. But they are not prepared or trained for anything. As reference, have you seen the video of two teenagers trying to use a rotary phone? Maybe a year ago, a liberal trying to use a weapon would be the same thing. They don't know how to load a magazine. They don't know about the safety. They don't know the difference between a 223 & a 9mm.
Here's a comparison. I'll take 5 guys from this board with the weapons they have within 30 ft of where they are right now against 50 Antifa guys with their weapons within 30 ft of them any day of the week. I'd think that any one of us 5 guys has fired more rounds than all 50 of the Antifa thugs.
Here's a comparison. I'll take 5 guys from this board with the weapons they have within 30 ft of where they are right now against 50 Antifa guys with their weapons within 30 ft of them any day of the week. I'd think that any one of us 5 guys has fired more rounds than all 50 of the Antifa thugs.
Tex, All of what you say is true in a stand up confrontation. Alone on the street and a pack of feral sheeple decide to attack you, now they are dangerous. They may not know squat about firearms or tactics but a hammer can kill too. They are already cowards, so they will not be offering to meet in open combat. They will sneak around and look for what ever advantage they think they can use. Never underestimate any opponent, even the worst boxer can get in a lucky shot. Most of the dogs in feral dog packs started out as domestic pets. By them selves those dogs would starve but as a pack, they become dangerous.
I would just terrify the lefty antifas by throwing a bar of soap at them.
TF- LMAO!!! That is hilarious! And I do totally agree. Was just saying all in all never underestimate an enemy. In this case most will agree that there is a huge potential for masses to flee the cities into the countryside looking to scavenge or loot for food. While they may heavily lack in skills and supplies at the beginning, those that survive will learn. 1/50 odds is going to be pretty steep to overcome even if we are skilled and have all the best gear and such.
maybe in America but not in Britain, not in the 21st Century, whilst some may leave it wont be in the droves that some think but in smaller numbers and in a country that has an obesity crisis many will not be able to WADDLE very far.
Think of it this way. I'll use a random city that comes to mind and a dark sky area.
Greensboro, NC has a population of just under 300k. Let's just say that the initial collapse from something nationwide that takes out our food distribution happens. Within a few weeks at best every major city just like this one will be mayhem. So just assume that 10% survive (30k) the first 4-6 months. But things are getting even worse in the cities with lack of water, no sewers and sanitation, and food is dwindling and dead bodies are everywhere. And over the coarse of the first 4-6 months the 10% formed groups at first that were 20-50 ppl and then to not get wiped out by raiding parties those groups joined other groups and so on until there were 6 groups total with of coarse some lone wolfs but for the sake of this scenario lets just assume that it plays out so that there are 6 groups with 5k ppl somehow surviving from the scavenged supplies throughout Greensboro, NC 4-6 months after the collapse. Now one of those groups leaders looks ahead and thinks that moving on out of the city with that size group is going to be better and decides to scavenge the countryside for cattle and take over farms one small town at a time.
What's to become of our small town?
It would take a leader to lead a town and people who were not ready for such to stand up to a force this size.
While someone to lead and stop such a force would be more rare to take a stand and lead a town that has fallen apart in a collapse, the chances of a large gang ravaging the country side is quite likely. Now could you and I and all of our neighbors stop fighting amongst ourselves and fight off a large group? Possibly.
My point is same as above. Don't underestimate the threat of large hordes of refugees. Some of them yes will be just large amounts of pathetic looking people with carts of crap that they push along the road with no purpose, but some may form a formidable group. Hence why I feel we should strive to be as far away from large population centers as possible.
Greensboro, NC has a population of just under 300k. Let's just say that the initial collapse from something nationwide that takes out our food distribution happens. Within a few weeks at best every major city just like this one will be mayhem. So just assume that 10% survive (30k) the first 4-6 months. But things are getting even worse in the cities with lack of water, no sewers and sanitation, and food is dwindling and dead bodies are everywhere. And over the coarse of the first 4-6 months the 10% formed groups at first that were 20-50 ppl and then to not get wiped out by raiding parties those groups joined other groups and so on until there were 6 groups total with of coarse some lone wolfs but for the sake of this scenario lets just assume that it plays out so that there are 6 groups with 5k ppl somehow surviving from the scavenged supplies throughout Greensboro, NC 4-6 months after the collapse. Now one of those groups leaders looks ahead and thinks that moving on out of the city with that size group is going to be better and decides to scavenge the countryside for cattle and take over farms one small town at a time.
What's to become of our small town?
It would take a leader to lead a town and people who were not ready for such to stand up to a force this size.
While someone to lead and stop such a force would be more rare to take a stand and lead a town that has fallen apart in a collapse, the chances of a large gang ravaging the country side is quite likely. Now could you and I and all of our neighbors stop fighting amongst ourselves and fight off a large group? Possibly.
My point is same as above. Don't underestimate the threat of large hordes of refugees. Some of them yes will be just large amounts of pathetic looking people with carts of crap that they push along the road with no purpose, but some may form a formidable group. Hence why I feel we should strive to be as far away from large population centers as possible.
exactly, and is just one of the reasons why I live where I do, even in Britain its a long walk from any of our large cities or urban centres.
people are not going to be able to carry much in the way of food and water(do they even know that any water not from the mains has to be treated?) and just hoping to find food and water along the way is a stupid idea and will end in failure and death.
so the conclusion is ; never,ever underestimate your opponent, don't overestimate your own abilities, plan ahead A,B,C as most likely when plan A is being executed it falls to shits..that comparioson of feral dogs are quite accurate,in large groups they pose a threat.
Meet my well prepped and winterised Were-Terrier , ready to savage the massed hordes of antifas, YUP its a dog parka for when he wants to go hunting Grizzlies
I think there are preppers on all sides of the political spectrum; just because someone is crazy in one thing doesn't mean they aren't at least a little sensible in another area. And I do believe most people do have survival instincts, even if modern society suppresses them or twists them. So it doesn't surprise me that people like this exist. Exactly how long they will survive after SHTF - well, you can't eat cigarettes.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 18,155
I'm just trying to imagine what a group of left wing anarchist "preppers" will be like when the SHTF.
First they will have drunken drugged out orgies to celebrate not having any authorities over them, which they will continue until the food/drugs/alcohol start to run low. Then in desperation they will start killing each other over aforementioned food/drugs/alcohol until it is all gone. Those that are left will then die of dehydration and starvation because the withdrawal symptoms will make them too weak to go find supplies.
First they will have drunken drugged out orgies to celebrate not having any authorities over them, which they will continue until the food/drugs/alcohol start to run low. Then in desperation they will start killing each other over aforementioned food/drugs/alcohol until it is all gone. Those that are left will then die of dehydration and starvation because the withdrawal symptoms will make them too weak to go find supplies.
A few points. First, I said me & 4 fellow DDPers, so it'd be 5 vs 50. And think about what I said. Consider how much ammo & weapons you have within 30 ft of where you are right now. If you can't fill a dolly, I'm not sure why you're here (or maybe expand the range to 100 or 200 ft?). I'd expect you can fill the back of a pickup, at least 10 weapons and 10k rounds? And you're one person, make it 5 full pickups for 5 guys. Now let's look at Antifa, 50 guys (or identify as male??). I'd guess they might have 2 handguns and 2 boxes of ammo among the whole lot. I'll go rich & add 10 BB guns. No spare magazines: 2 guns, 2 magazines, call it 20 rounds and able to reload 2-3 times? Back to our side. Anyone here have less than enough magazines to load 500 rounds? Call it 25 magazines. This is per person. And, you have actually fired your weapons! So, anyone want to project that battle?
OK, back to scenarios. I've done a model where I've looked at smaller towns and larger cities within 100 miles. Take the population, break it into 3 equally sized groups. Assume a worst-case scenario like EMP. Group 1: head out of the town to go to family in the country (they are no threat). Group 2: stay frozen in their homes. They'll get slaughtered by group 3. Group 3 ( the problem): 1/3rd of the people go out & scavenge/kill/steal to survive, forming packs. Most will be smaller, dozen(s)? They'll first go throughout the cities (places they know) slaughtering each other. And once the cities are gutted, they'll move outward (weeks/months). Numbers: Group 1 (33%): no threat, may or may not make it. Well, let's say 5% of this group turn into Group 3. Group 2 (33%) are dead. Group 3: 33% start, let's say 80% of them get killed. That leaves 5% of Group1 (who've gone bad) and 3% of Group 3. That's 8%. Assume they'll be moving out via major highways/roads primarily. If you have a city of 1 million, that's 80k people heading out to cause trouble. Assume 2/3rds are on major roads & 1/3rd go cross-country. And assume __% are killed for every mile, this might be 5%, take your own guess. Times will be dangerous. Those 80k at 5,10,20, or 30 miles will drop to 62k, 47k, 28k, and 17k respectively. Take a smaller town of 10k and take 2 '0's off each of those numbers (620, 470...). Keep in mind, these are all the people moving in all directions. If you think you'll get 1% of the exodus, plan accordingly. And plan for your region, liberal areas will have far more cowards (group 2), and some areas like Chicago will have far more Group 3.
Ok, in these scenarios the zombies will be armed. But minimal training, minimal supplies, and desperate. A bad combination for them if you're ready.
OK, back to scenarios. I've done a model where I've looked at smaller towns and larger cities within 100 miles. Take the population, break it into 3 equally sized groups. Assume a worst-case scenario like EMP. Group 1: head out of the town to go to family in the country (they are no threat). Group 2: stay frozen in their homes. They'll get slaughtered by group 3. Group 3 ( the problem): 1/3rd of the people go out & scavenge/kill/steal to survive, forming packs. Most will be smaller, dozen(s)? They'll first go throughout the cities (places they know) slaughtering each other. And once the cities are gutted, they'll move outward (weeks/months). Numbers: Group 1 (33%): no threat, may or may not make it. Well, let's say 5% of this group turn into Group 3. Group 2 (33%) are dead. Group 3: 33% start, let's say 80% of them get killed. That leaves 5% of Group1 (who've gone bad) and 3% of Group 3. That's 8%. Assume they'll be moving out via major highways/roads primarily. If you have a city of 1 million, that's 80k people heading out to cause trouble. Assume 2/3rds are on major roads & 1/3rd go cross-country. And assume __% are killed for every mile, this might be 5%, take your own guess. Times will be dangerous. Those 80k at 5,10,20, or 30 miles will drop to 62k, 47k, 28k, and 17k respectively. Take a smaller town of 10k and take 2 '0's off each of those numbers (620, 470...). Keep in mind, these are all the people moving in all directions. If you think you'll get 1% of the exodus, plan accordingly. And plan for your region, liberal areas will have far more cowards (group 2), and some areas like Chicago will have far more Group 3.
Ok, in these scenarios the zombies will be armed. But minimal training, minimal supplies, and desperate. A bad combination for them if you're ready.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 18,155
Shoot ONE and they will be outraged , Shoot the 2nd and they will start to react, shoot the 3rd and they will realise they are vulnerable, shoot the 4th and they will panic, by the 6th shot they will be trying to get out of the way.
