- Joined
- Nov 27, 2015
- Messages
- 10,004
The pictures make me think that my original diagnosis of Parkinson's is real.
Who is HTC?The pictures make me think that my original diagnosis of Parkinson's is real.
I kinda thought you meant Hillary. I can't see the photo on my phone. I bearly have enough signal strength just to get on this site.
Dam slow connection.Is there an echo in the room?
No, she is not. There are much better options out there.My favorite part is that it's only in Right Wing papers. Like the Left is going to show her in a negative light. She is their savior
Because Doreena, she was almost President. The job is hard enough on your health without having serious medical issues from the get go. And there have been many indications that something was seriously wrong medically with Hillary. Her political views aside, she was in no condition to hold the office. And that is NOT something that should have been hidden from the public.Besides, who cares if she is in a brace or not? Except her?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ok, point taken. But it has been proven the pres has lied over and over.We do, in so much that many of us feel that she had health problems, which were concealed or downplayed during the election, in order to better her chances of getting the nod and becoming POTUS.
Unhealthy. Not a good thing to have out there during a US election.
Then add to that - liar, for not being upfront about it.
We elect the Pres. The VP is an afterthought most years, if there is a good chance that the VP will become P, that's something we should know.
Hence the caring now. If that makes sense.
If she hadn't run for Pres, I wouldn't care at all, and honestly, I don't care now so much as like having my belief that she is a liar constantly reaffirmed.
Because Doreena, she was almost President. The job is hard enough on your health without having serious medical issues from the get go. And there have been many indications that something was seriously wrong medically with Hillary. Her political views aside, she was in no condition to hold the office. And that is NOT something that should have been hidden from the public.
[emoji4]Fair enough.
But we weren't talking about Trumps lies.
If your point is that I have a double standard, when it comes to HER lies versus HIS lies, you are correct. I do.
Doreena, look. When you see me post, just try to remember that I am a little bit of a misogynist, and a casual racist, and a Gen X loser with delusions of being a barrel chested freedom fighter, and cut me some slack and we will get along fine.
Doreena,
Honestly, for your own good, this forum is not for you. Your feelings are going to get hurt badly and nobody will care. Or you're here just to cause trouble, and sooner than later you'll be banned. I suspect you are a reincarnated ToExist.
It never ceases to amaze me how liberals can reject facts when indisputable evidence is overflowing. "Are you sure that's Hillary?" Thanks for the laugh. That's about the stupidest question I've heard in a month, maybe this year.
The pictures make me think that my original diagnosis of Parkinson's is real.
Leave it to a Brit to discover the correct diagnosis...Mad Cow disease...
Doreena,
Honestly, for your own good, this forum is not for you. Your feelings are going to get hurt badly and nobody will care. Or you're here just to cause trouble, and sooner than later you'll be banned. I suspect you are a reincarnated ToExist.
It never ceases to amaze me how liberals can reject facts when indisputable evidence is overflowing. "Are you sure that's Hillary?" Thanks for the laugh. That's about the stupidest question I've heard in a month, maybe this year.
What did I say that would get me banned? And I have no idea who toExist is/was. I am not here just to cause trouble, just to trying to have a respectful discussion, agree or not agree. If a different point of view gets one banned here, I guess you are right, perhaps I don’t belong here, but I have met people that seem willing to converse respectfully. You yourself have questioned the media, so is questioning it when it does not keep with your opinion being stupid? Or cautious?Doreena,
Honestly, for your own good, this forum is not for you. Your feelings are going to get hurt badly and nobody will care. Or you're here just to cause trouble, and sooner than later you'll be banned. I suspect you are a reincarnated ToExist.
It never ceases to amaze me how liberals can reject facts when indisputable evidence is overflowing. "Are you sure that's Hillary?" Thanks for the laugh. That's about the stupidest question I've heard in a month, maybe this year.
What did I say that would get me banned? And I have no idea who toExist is/was. I am not here just to cause trouble, just to trying to have a respectful discussion, agree or not agree. If a different point of view gets one banned here, I guess you are right, perhaps I don’t belong here, but I have met people that seem willing to converse respectfully. You yourself have questioned the media, so is questioning it when it does not keep with your opinion being stupid? Or cautious?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: