FLYNN facts.

Homesteading & Country Living Forum

Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
BREAKING: Former FBI General Counsel James Baker Has Flipped! Durham is Building Conspiracy Case on All of Those Who Lied to the Court!

Former US Attorney Joe diGenova was on the Howie Carr Show this week and he provided some more inside information regarding General Flynn’s case and the unraveling of the coup to remove President Trump from office.


diGenova discussed the Durham investigation and said at the 5:30 mark that Durham is building a conspiracy case and anyone who lied to the court will be indicted for obstruction of justice charges:

The bottom line is this, it’s unfolding and what’s happening is, what Durham is actually doing is he’s painting a picture and not everyone of these acts is going to be a specific separate crime. But they are going to be, what’s called overt acts in a conspiracy. One to defraud the United States government. One to deny the civil rights of Trump and Flynn and Page and a bunch of other people.”

All I can say is, we had better see trials for those involved in this attempted coup!
 
Wow – the latest documents released by the DOJ provide additional evidence that the Obama White House was running the operation to spy on candidate and then President Trump in an effort to destroy the incoming administration and have President Trump eventually removed from office!

The latest emails released from the DOJ today in the General Michael Flynn case show the Obama White House was running the show. In the last line in the first paragraph on page 9 of the 12 page release it says:

We need to discuss what happens if DOJ directs us, or directly tells, VPOTUS or anyone else about the [redacted] specifically w/r/t [with regards to] what we do directly with him. I think it will be very difficult not to do some sort of overt step with him, a defensive briefing or interview under light “defensive briefing” pretext unless WH specifically directs us not to.”


upload_2020-5-1_10-35-46.jpeg



If President Trump did anything like this, he would be in prison!!! Is Obama going to get away with this ATTEMPTED COUP on a President?
 
Truth? What is Truth? (remember the quote?) JUSTICE? WHAT IS JUSTICE??? Where do you start to chase the witches? where do you stop? If all politicians who are committing crimes were prosecuted...who would be running the US??? This will have repercussions or the civil unrest will get out of hand. GP
 
Last edited:
I think many of you are making this just too complicated.

How about this plan. Over the coming weeks, Flynn is freed with a dropped court case. Trump gives him a week to recover. Then Trump puts Flynn in charge of the FBI, with a 'gloves off' policy. And let the chips fall where they may.
 
robinjopo said:
TF my thought is that Trump wants to stay away from a pardon that can be used against him in election.
It's taking longer, but he wants it to be done without adding his name.
Click to expand...

I never said for Trump to pardon Flynn. In a matter of weeks, the courts should be done with the whole 'prosecution' and Flynn will be a free man. At that point, Flynn is a qualified former General who is looking for a job. The current head of the FBI is a swamp creature, Trump simply needs to say "I have no confidence in Wray", and fire him. Then consider all the candidates that could clean up the FBI's mess, and announce that Flynn is the man to clean house. The only question is if Flynn would want to get as dirty as needed to do the job. But it sure would be fun to watch it happen.
 
TexasFreedom said:
I never said for Trump to pardon Flynn. In a matter of weeks, the courts should be done with the whole 'prosecution' and Flynn will be a free man. At that point, Flynn is a qualified former General who is looking for a job. The current head of the FBI is a swamp creature, Trump simply needs to say "I have no confidence in Wray", and fire him. Then consider all the candidates that could clean up the FBI's mess, and announce that Flynn is the man to clean house. The only question is if Flynn would want to get as dirty as needed to do the job. But it sure would be fun to watch it happen.
Click to expand...

I never meant that you did TF. Sorry for this poor sentence structure.
 
Judge in Flynn case hires lawyer as appeals court reviews his decision not to dismiss: report

U.S. District Court Judge Emmett G. Sullivan has taken the unusual step of hiring an attorney to represent him as an appeals court reviews his decision not to immediately grant the Justice Department's (DOJ's) request to dismiss its case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-sullivan-lawyer-wilkinson-flynn-case
 
Arcticdude said:
I haven't been following this story much, but didn't this guy plead guilty to something? If so, shouldn't he do his time?
Click to expand...

Was a guilty plea under duress from a corrupt and dishonest so called justice department that was threatening to falsely prosecute his son also if he did not admit to a crime. If it was you,, would you have pleaded guilty? I probably would have.

Pleading guilty does not necessarily admit guilt, it could mean excepting punishment by those claiming a crime was permitted. And if that crime was proven to be not true and fabricated by corrupt officials, then the guilty plea should be null and void.
 
Rellgar said:
Was a guilty plea under duress from a corrupt and dishonest so called justice department that was threatening to falsely prosecute his son also if he did not admit to a crime. If it was you,, would you have pleaded guilty? I probably would have.

Pleading guilty does not necessarily admit guilt, it could mean excepting punishment by those claiming a crime was permitted. And if that crime was proven to be not true and fabricated by corrupt officials, then the guilty plea should be null and void.
Click to expand...
That's a tough one. I don't know what I'd do, but I understand now why he pleaded the way he did.
I don't trust any agency of our government.
Thanks for the explanation.
 
Rellgar said:
Was a guilty plea under duress from a corrupt and dishonest so called justice department that was threatening to falsely prosecute his son also if he did not admit to a crime. If it was you,, would you have pleaded guilty? I probably would have.

Pleading guilty does not necessarily admit guilt, it could mean excepting punishment by those claiming a crime was permitted. And if that crime was proven to be not true and fabricated by corrupt officials, then the guilty plea should be null and void.
Click to expand...
That's a tough one. I don't know what I'd do, but I understand now why he pleaded the way he did.
I don't trust any agency of our government.
Thanks for the explanation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top