I'm on the side of the Patriots who are defending the Constitution against the treasonous Democrat party and other Socialist, Communist, Fascists and Globalists.
Someone has to defend the constitution. However, until patriots get a means of communication unable to be monitored by the globalists, I don't see a real movement.
Someone needs to be skilled in strategy. Online organization would never work. The globalist own the internet.
Maybe. January 6th didn't give me much confidence, though. Even patriots need a leader, I think. The majority of people are too timid or complacent to rock the boat even when it's headed for a crash.Not if every Patriot let's it be known publicly that they stand against these enemies and will stop them by whatever means is necessary.
We have been fighting this civil war for 6 years now.
It isn’t guns and bullets.
It’s the disinformation.
Those who control the media, control the narrative.
If it doesn’t stop soon, it will become Guns and Bullets.
I was only reflecting back to how devastated the Kommunist Republik was over Trump winning. Literally liberals crying in the street.That is probably what they are hoping for. Imagine the ratings!
Its been a lot longer than 6 years though. This started back when all of the reporters were giving glowing reviews of Communist Russia and the rich hippy children were going to India to "study" with the Communist gurus.
I do t mean show up where they hold all the cards. I mean declare them enemies with your free speech.Maybe. January 6th didn't give me much confidence, though. Even patriots need a leader, I think. The majority of people are too timid or complacent to rock the boat even when it's headed for a crash.
I'm not saying people shouldn't be loud and uncompromising, just that it would be best if we didn't always show our hand to the other side.
We've had it for years, and it's never been the internet..."Someone has to defend the constitution until patriots get a means of communication unable to be monitored by the globalists"
Become ungovernable...didn't the Vietnamese and Taliban teach you anything?I do t mean show up where they hold all the cards. I mean declare them enemies with your free speech.
I have been saying for at least two years, the beginning of the Civil War will be businesses identifying with a party, and shoppers going to their party's businesses. Then attacks on those bussineses (started by the radical left). There will be alot more Kyle Rittenhouses, and anger when the left goes after only the right protecting themselves. This will lead to people having to leave cities with which they are not politically aligned. Those 55 counties that voted blue, will really understand what they have done then. The pompous democrats keep saying the left pays for the red states. Well, good luck getting food MFers.
Our government IS the common enemy.This is not gonna be pretty...we will need a common enemy to pull together...oh wait, our government is working on that, Russia bad...
To most of those who understand, it is....but to the lemmings?Our government IS the common enemy.
Defending the constitution does not require strategy, it requires nothing but resolve. They do not need to communicate, they only need to know what is right vs. what is wrong and be tired enough of being oppressed to die for the freedoms they claim to value so much.Someone has to defend the constitution. However, until patriots get a means of communication unable to be monitored by the globalists, I don't see a real movement.
Someone needs to be skilled in strategy. Online organization would never work. The globalist own the internet.
Well, have at it, then.Defending the constitution does not require strategy, it requires nothing but resolve. They do not need to communicate, they only need to know what is right vs. what is wrong and be tired enough of being oppressed to die for the freedoms they claim to value so much.
I hope you were joking. Evil wins wars all the time. Who’s right and who’s wrong is a matter for the history books to decide, and history is written by the victors. Strategy, logistics, manpower, these are all things that are required in any conflict. It doesn’t matter if the conflict is hot conflict or Cold War status.Defending the constitution does not require strategy, it requires nothing but resolve. They do not need to communicate, they only need to know what is right vs. what is wrong and be tired enough of being oppressed to die for the freedoms they claim to value so much.
Few of us have the influence or the monetary means. Though some of us do our part whenever and however we can. Things like this take time, but we do have our leaders, we just have to actively get involved.Well, have at it, then.
Many people seem to have the answers but so far I'm not seeing anyone do anything.
Nearly all of the people claiming they "don't see anyone doing anything" are doing nothing themselves except sitting there waiting for someone with more courage than them to challenge the system.Well, have at it, then.
Many people seem to have the answers but so far I'm not seeing anyone do anything
Nearly all of the people claiming they "don't see anyone doing anything" are doing nothing themselves except sitting there waiting for someone with more courage than them to challenge the system.
Resolve requires mental preparedness and courage, it does not mean having the blueprints to the governors house and an encrypted texting app with discussions on who to "straighten out". If people understood the laws that govern them, they would have a better chance at defending themselves and their rights. And if enough people did that, things would change.
Don't like seatbelt laws? Maybe you should learn how to challenge court jurisdiction (hint: if you are at trial, its too late). What does jurisdicion have to do with it? A whole lot. Step one - establish that it is a criminal matter by asking them, they will certainly agree. Step 2- point out that the constitution guarantees you a jury trial for anything over $20. At this point they will look irritated and begin to stumble over their words and finally say that this is a civil matter and that you are not entitled to a jury (as no jury will convict on a seatbelt case). At that time, you simply motion to dismiss on the grounds that the criminal court you are standing in just admitted to not having jurisdiction and then walk out when they are forced to agree with you.
Know a felon with a firearm charge? Imagine how pissed that person would be to find out their public defender (working for the prosecutor and paid by the state) blasted the defendant right through omnibus and pretrial and now his opportunity to address evidentiary and constitutional issues is gone forever! That Rule 11 (minnesota) opportunity is never coming back and you will not be allowed to utter the words "Bill of Rights" in trial because you missed your chance!
"Doing something about it" doesn't require an AR-15., although it is a nice thing to have on hand.
Nearly all of the people claiming they "don't see anyone doing anything" are doing nothing themselves except sitting there waiting for someone with more courage than them to challenge the system.
Resolve requires mental preparedness and courage, it does not mean having the blueprints to the governors house and an encrypted texting app with discussions on who to "straighten out". If people understood the laws that govern them, they would have a better chance at defending themselves and their rights. And if enough people did that, things would change.
Don't like seatbelt laws? Maybe you should learn how to challenge court jurisdiction (hint: if you are at trial, its too late). What does jurisdicion have to do with it? A whole lot. Step one - establish that it is a criminal matter by asking them, they will certainly agree. Step 2- point out that the constitution guarantees you a jury trial for anything over $20. At this point they will look irritated and begin to stumble over their words and finally say that this is a civil matter and that you are not entitled to a jury (as no jury will convict on a seatbelt case). At that time, you simply motion to dismiss on the grounds that the criminal court you are standing in just admitted to not having jurisdiction and then walk out when they are forced to agree with you.
Know a felon with a firearm charge? Imagine how pissed that person would be to find out their public defender (working for the prosecutor and paid by the state) blasted the defendant right through omnibus and pretrial and now his opportunity to address evidentiary and constitutional issues is gone forever! That Rule 11 (minnesota) opportunity is never coming back and you will not be allowed to utter the words "Bill of Rights" in trial because you missed your chance!
"Doing something about it" doesn't require an AR-15., although it is a nice thing to have on hand.
That is certainly a problem. Itnis unfortunate that those who get involved in politics are normally people who crave power, so they are often easily manipulated by that desire.Few of us have the influence or the monetary means. Though some of us do our part whenever and however we can. Things like this take time, but we do have our leaders, we just have to actively get involved.
Enter your email address to join: