Synagogue shooting

Doomsday Prepper Forums

Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Not sure what you are complaining about. Here is the information on the suggestion about armed guards: https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/new...-Synagogue-Shooting-Pittsburgh-498790791.html

I think what I read about guards getting shot was early on, apparently it was the responding police and SWAT team that got shot.... “In all, two police officers and two SWAT officers were wounded in the confrontation, Hissrich said. Three of them were shot, according to the city's public safety department.”

About the hair: https://apple.news/Aq5sD1kxsQpWk4acOxLfluA

You may want to get your news from other than apple news or at least read the entire article and not just the headlines.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The comment about canceling because of his hair was a joke. The real reason he was thinking of canceling was the shooting,
"At first, I was thinking 'I'll cancel' and then I said we can't let evil change our life and change our schedule," the president said. "Otherwise, we give them too much credit, we make them too important."

You may want to get your news from other than apple news or at least read the entire article and not just the headlines.
 
And trump suggested that they have armed security and complained that the shooting made him have a bad hair day. Very helpful. Btw, the security they had were casualties.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


They should have had armed security there . I agree that every facility where People gather should have armed security or let People carry if They want to . Every day armed Citizens stop crimes in progress . I carry almost every where I go simply because I want to . Every school in this area has armed Police officers asigned to them . I agree 100% with President Trump about armed security .
 
I believe that this particular synagogue was targeted because they were working with refugees.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
The comment about canceling because of his hair was a joke. The real reason he was thinking of canceling was the shooting,
"At first, I was thinking 'I'll cancel' and then I said we can't let evil change our life and change our schedule," the president said. "Otherwise, we give them too much credit, we make them too important."

You may want to get your news from other than apple news or at least read the entire article and not just the headlines.
I don’t typically go there for news, I was trying to find a quote or synopsis from a source that was not ones picked on previously. I frequently check the ratings of sites for impartiality. That one may not have been the best choice, but I wanted to find out what the beef was.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
The minister yelling at Trump that he wasn't wanted is just bad manners.

The private taping at the hospital shows how things really are with Trump and the "folk" really are, but the media won't show it. It has to be someone with their phone showing the truth.

And they wonder why they are considered FAKE NEWS.
 
The minister yelling at Trump that he wasn't wanted is just bad manners.

The private taping at the hospital shows how things really are with Trump and the "folk" really are, but the media won't show it. It has to be someone with their phone showing the truth.

And they wonder why they are considered FAKE NEWS.
The Presbyterian minister was very upset...rightly so. She was concerned because the families could not sit shiva because of the traffic.

But Trump tweeted he was treated very nicely by Pittsburgh and everyone loved him...so I guess it is ok.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
The Presbyterian minister was very upset...rightly so. She was concerned because the families could not sit shiva because of the traffic.
But Trump tweeted he was treated very nicely by Pittsburgh and everyone loved him...so I guess it is ok.

There was no reason for that woman to behave the way she did, and it's all the worse that she is (was?) a minister. I'd vote to fire my minister if he ever behaved like that. This woman is just a leftie hater, period. There is no excuse. To pardon her behavior is to condone it.
 
There was no reason for that woman to behave the way she did, and it's all the worse that she is (was?) a minister. I'd vote to fire my minister if he ever behaved like that. This woman is just a leftie hater, period. There is no excuse. To pardon her behavior is to condone it.
I am not saying that she was right, but I completely understand her. Imagine that you had just lost a loved one, and you were trying to honor them at a visitation, but you couldn’t get there because of any reason. Wouldn’t you be emotional, grief-stricken? That is how she was acting. Plus, many people feel that the presidential rhetoric encouraged the shooter, so that would make my scenario more like the person responsible for not being able to go to the visitation was the cause of both the death and not being able to attend.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
if someone takes a life they should lose theirs, an eye for an eye, I don't see why we should pay to house them in prison for the rest of their lives as happens over here.
I am for that 100%. Found guilty of first degree murder=immediate death sentence. To be carried out in 30 days.
 
[
I am not saying that she was right, but I completely understand her. Imagine that you had just lost a loved one, and you were trying to honor them at a visitation, but you couldn’t get there because of any reason. Wouldn’t you be emotional, grief-stricken? That is how she was acting. Plus, many people feel that the presidential rhetoric encouraged the shooter, so that would make my scenario more like the person responsible for not being able to go to the visitation was the cause of both the death and not being able to attend.

You're completely wrong here. The screaming woman did NOT lose anyone. Now there may have been family members delayed by Trump, and I can see them being emotional, but there is no way you can legitimately transpose their grief to this crazy woman.

Now using your theory, the next time a black guy shoots and kills a white guy, we have to blame Hillary. After all, she just made the most racist comment I've heard in years. It's obvious that her racism caused any upcoming murders. It's right there in video if you want to see it.

It seems that all democrats are married to evidence-free facts.
 
[

You're completely wrong here. The screaming woman did NOT lose anyone. Now there may have been family members delayed by Trump, and I can see them being emotional, but there is no way you can legitimately transpose their grief to this crazy woman.

Now using your theory, the next time a black guy shoots and kills a white guy, we have to blame Hillary. After all, she just made the most racist comment I've heard in years. It's obvious that her racism caused any upcoming murders. It's right there in video if you want to see it.

It seems that all democrats are married to evidence-free facts.
First, don’t put everyone ...Democrats... into one category,please. And if you mean to put me there, although I tend to support democratic candidates, I have voted for different parties as I vote issues, not along party lines. Next, I am not sure what video you are talking about, the most recent I found which charged HRC with racism was where a host confused Holder and Booker and she made fun of the host by making a poor joke about them looking alike.

I am no fan of HRC, but I have never heard her inciting violence against any opponent, race, profession or gender. We have trump on tape/video saying things like this. Trump uses words to encourage violence and assault.

The woman I saw said that some of the victims were her neighbors. We don’t know how close they were, but as a minister, her job is to care deeply for people. Yes, even trump. But she is also a person,too. Who among us is perfect?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Doreena,

I'm sure there are a few democrats who have a few bits of evidence to support their 'facts'. But that's the rare exception, and from many things you've written here, you're not one of them.

My first example. How on earth can you really say what Hillary said was "making a poor joke"? Had Trump said the exact same thing in the exact same conversation, every media outlet for the next 28 days would be calling him a racist & demanding immediate resignation. But, please, Doreena, prove me wrong. Take your best shot at explaining how that comment was not blatantly racist. And explain why all of the MSM didn't even mention it. Please provide evidence to support your 'fact' that it was just a poor joke. And more evidence (#2), please quote times when Trump said anything even close to that in the past 20 years.

And let me give you a third shot at this. You said you never heard HRC incite violence. Just the other day she said they would not be civil until they win. How else can that be interpreted? What, 'not civil' means they don't pass the salt & pepper?

For the minister crazy lady, who said anything about being 'perfect'? Being a decent human being is all we ask, and a minister knows how to hold things together in stressful situations. Caring for people does not include going crazy. So, with that I showed your fourth evidence-free fact regarding her inexcusable behavior. This is your 4th chance, present some real evidence to excuse the inexcusable behavior.

There are 4 examples where you've presented evidence-free 'facts' in a single post. Please prove me wrong.

Post-edit: My apologies if this seems rude. I don't mean it as an insult. But I respect truth. Facts, real facts, facts that have evidence that validates them. And the modern democrat party is completely lacking truth. That is where my anger is directed, not really at Doreena. You're just a victim of their deception, which makes you party to the crime sadly.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top