New Zealand shooting

Doomsday Prepper Forums

Help Support Doomsday Prepper Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I don't know how someone can be true to islam and its teachings and be a 'good' person. As others have said, their koran instructs them to be devious, infiltrate non muslim areas, grow in numbers, and take over oppressing the others and/or killing them.

So a muslim person can choose: either be 'good' or be 'muslim'. But wait, we already said a muslim person is 'muslim' by definition and that means they have chosen to not be 'good'. I suppose they can reject/rewrite parts of their holy book. But if their book is wrong in one area, why in the world would they believe other parts of it are true? And many muslims do not know what is written in the koran. But if they believe the first part of the koran, why would you think they' won't believe the next part?
 
Not all muslims are bad, theres a dynamic, but youve got to know that dynamic via much research. They're the Shias, and they're the fine line between Christianity being wiped out in the Middle East, and globalism destroying Syria. The bad ones are our "allies", aka Saudi Arabia, and other shit stain Sunnis.

I have no remorse about the shooting. I've enjoyed the video to a bag of popcorn or five, and it honestly felt like someone popped a festering boil on my back, that i couldn't reach.

Also, Islam and the Quran aren't bad, Sharia law is. The Quran actually has no mention of headscarfs, and orders Muslims to give a home to friends, and protect other peoples of the book. Sharia came later, and turned Islam into what it is today.
 
Simple enough . Had some or even one of the victims been armed they could have stopped the crime before it happened . You are responsible for your own security . The Police will get there in time to make a report . A little 100 lb Women stopped a Church shooting here in Tn a few years ago by using Her own firearm .
 
Simple enough . Had some or even one of the victims been armed they could have stopped the crime before it happened . You are responsible for your own security . The Police will get there in time to make a report . A little 100 lb Women stopped a Church shooting here in Tn a few years ago by using Her own firearm .
Supposedly the police response in NZ, was actually closer to 36 minutes, some estimates have said. I saw a pic of the cops that responded. One eas a tiny woman, one was a terrified looking stick of a man, and the third was 500 lbs. You can tell that they weren't prepared for this, and are totally embarrassed.
 
Not all muslims are bad, theres a dynamic, but youve got to know that dynamic via much research. They're the Shias, and they're the fine line between Christianity being wiped out in the Middle East, and globalism destroying Syria. The bad ones are our "allies", aka Saudi Arabia, and other shit stain Sunnis.
Also, Islam and the Quran aren't bad, Sharia law is. The Quran actually has no mention of headscarfs, and orders Muslims to give a home to friends, and protect other peoples of the book. Sharia came later, and turned Islam into what it is today.

Seriously? I'm not talking about head scarfs, they never beheaded anyone I can think of. Variation of islam do not matter. The koran specifically calls out to behead non-believers. Either the koran has this or it does not. And any flavor of islam can't change the words which are their guidelines.

To choose to be a Muslim = to choose to follow the koran = the koran instructs them to kill us … which part of that are you missing?
 
Seriously? I'm not talking about head scarfs, they never beheaded anyone I can think of. Variation of islam do not matter. The koran specifically calls out to behead non-believers. Either the koran has this or it does not. And any flavor of islam can't change the words which are their guidelines.

To choose to be a Muslim = to choose to follow the koran = the koran instructs them to kill us … which part of that are you missing?
Jihad is literally self defense, and it's been both broadly interpreted by extremists so that it fits any narrative, as well as it being used properly. After all, we did invade Afghanistan after Saudi Arabia blew up the twin towers, and we did invade Iraq for Israel, and Saudi Arabia. I hope that if we're ever put in a situation, where Uruguay bombs Russia, and then Russia invades us for having a similar name to South America, and because they actually have ulterior motives related to our regional hegemony, that we defend our land via our own Jihad, which is what is happening now, except with Muslims, and mass immigration, from third world cess pits.

I'm all for the pure idea of Jihad. In fact, Christianity is so lacking in any form of self defense that had Pope Urban II not ordered it, the first Crusade would have never happened, and Europe would be 100% Muslim owned today. It took Pope Urban II everything he had, to go against the weakest beliefs of anti-war Christianity, to justify doing violence on men who meant to conquer Europe.

The Quran was written because the Quraysh, Muhammed's tribe, were violent inbreds, and he knew his people were dumb savages. For its first seven hundred years, Islam was the most progressive force on Earth, going so far as to give us falconry, and carrier pigeons, but as it was crushed between the Crusades, and Mongols, it became what it is today. Sharia Law, which had been written by other men, who were misinterpeting the Quran, finally became the lifeblood of Islam around 1300, with Baibars, and voila, we have what we have today.

I one-hundred percent believe that 90% of Muslims are bad, but I also know that we attacked them for Israel and Saudi Arabia, especially countries that those two villainous country's wanted knocked out, all those countries we've bulldozed since 2001.

And yes, the quran uses the term "hijab" to refer to a "cover", such as a curtain, and it is only recommended for things such as changing. The only other mention of women's clothing, is that women should dress modestly in public, not in trash bag suits.
 
the Quraysh, Muhammed's tribe, were violent inbreds, and he knew his people were dumb savages.

Let me correct your grammar. In both cases remove the word 'were' and replace with either 'are' or 'remain'.

Islam was the most progressive force on Earth
There are about a billion muslims worldwide, I would not say it was 'crushed'. And you might want to replace 'progressive' with 'aggressive' (along with replacing 'was' with 'remains').

And you did not respond to my note that the koran specifically calls out to behead infidels. And to support the stance that islam is incompatible with anyone else, look at how islam battles every race/religion around the world: Christians, atheists, Buddhist, jews… there is not a single other religion that can peacefully co-exist with muslims/islam.
 
Religion is just the tool that greedy power hungry assholes use to motivate impressionable young men into killing their opponents.

AND people sometimes wonder why I am an agnostic. The only part I would amend is the word "is" and substitute the word "Can".
 
isn't there something in the Quoran along the lines of " the only good Kaffir(non believer) is a dead Kaffir"?? and I have heard of Christians being told to " convert or die". I don't know, just what I heard somewhere, I have no personal knowledge.
 
isn't there something in the Quoran along the lines of " the only good Kaffir(non believer) is a dead Kaffir"?? and I have heard of Christians being told to " convert or die". I don't know, just what I heard somewhere, I have no personal knowledge.
Where in the world are Christians beheading and killing non Christians? While muzlims do it every day.
 
Let me correct your grammar. In both cases remove the word 'were' and replace with either 'are' or 'remain'.

There are about a billion muslims worldwide, I would not say it was 'crushed'. And you might want to replace 'progressive' with 'aggressive' (along with replacing 'was' with 'remains').

And you did not respond to my note that the koran specifically calls out to behead infidels. And to support the stance that islam is incompatible with anyone else, look at how islam battles every race/religion around the world: Christians, atheists, Buddhist, jews… there is not a single other religion that can peacefully co-exist with muslims/islam.
You're not wrong, but you are wrong to think that Islam wasn't a wonderful thing for its first seven hundred years. It was aggressive, but progressive. There's nothing wrong with stating that. Europe was an abscess on humanity, outside of Byzantium, until we began switching places around 1300. The crusaders, though the good guys, were savages. They even ate corpses at the battle of Maraat al-Numan. Despite this, now Islam is the abscess.

I'd like you to quote me the part of the Quran that says to behead people. It's there I've found it, but did you actually find it yourself? It also says to protect Christians and Jews, and also says to not kill non-believers, because like any Abrahamic Holy book, it's loaded with bipolar inconsistencies. Even the passage you're referring to is referring to people like me; atheists.

It's irrelevant anyway. Religion is stupid, war is a constant, and every Abrahamic Holy book allows for having sex with kids, killing innocents, keeping slaves, beheading, torture, war, leveling cities, and on, and on. Hell, the God of the old Testament is cruel, and the Talmud goes as far as to tell Jews they can, to this day, sacrifice kids to a Canaanite good named Moloch (Sanhedrin 64b). The Christian's bible is even worse, because it tells them to suck their enemies feet, and forgive them for the cruelest of sins. I'd rather have the deception of Judaism, and the sword of Islam, than the submission of Christianity.

Each one of these religions has, and is, an affront to history, and are nothing more than outdated bronze age religions. Christians destroyed two of the most important libraries in history; the library at Tripoli, and the library at Constantinople. They burned ancient relics, and writings by Roman and Greek philosophers, that we'll never get back, they even destroyed the basis for western Rome's stability, destroying the world's most amazing empire. Jews still destroy Palestine in order to make it more like old Israel, chomping at the bit to demolish the al-Aqsa mosque, to fulfill some lame prophecy. They also change the names on maps, while stealing surrounding land, in order to fulfill a four thousand year old biblical redrawing of maps that spans a terrifyingly unstable amount of other people's lands. Christian NGOs keep alive tens of millions of third worlders with food, and handouts, who then flood our nations, and other Christian NGOs let them right in, and give them more.

The best way I heard it put was, "Judaism the general, Islam the sword They command." So I amended it to make it more accurate, " Judaism the general, Islam the sword they command, Christianity their Trojan Horse." A trifecta of destructive regression.
 
Last edited:
personally I refuse to feel sorry,just being white,male and a meat eater,
the other side have been asking for something like this for a very long time and now they got it.
sure I will be watching my back and my surroundings more closely as some form of retaliation is on its way from that vermin.
 
Didn't take NZ long to completely buckle under.

All the women are wearing the hijab. Even police women, and they are broadcasting the call to prayer.

Now they have banned guns, but only 37 of the 13,000 have been turned in.

Talk about striking while the iron is hot. The libs saw the chance and jumped in.

This will come back to bite them in the buttocks.
 
NZ better start learning Chinese. I don't think they have squat for a military, and now they will have an unarmed population to boot. The liberals won't fight and the conservative's will be disarmed. They can kiss their Azz's goodbye.
 
Here is what happened in NZ.

Their first step was to redefine "Military Style Firearms" by executive order to include any semiautomatic with a removable magazine. This causes them to fall under the 1992 amendments of the Arms Act of 1983 which heavily regulate "Military Style Firearms." The actual executive order specified "capable of holding more than 5 rounds, but we all know that's a crock because if the magazine is removable, then you can remove it and put a magazine with a higher capacity in. So in effect any semiautomatic firearm with a removable magazine. I suppose a Browning BAR with a hinged floorplate would be legal since I don't know of any way to put a high capacity magazine in it.

And why section (b)? It's totally redundant. In section (a), "a semi-automatic firearm" would include rifles, pistols and shotguns. Whoever wrote this didn't know jack squat about firearms.

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2019/0055/latest/096be8ed8185276a.pdf
Certain semi-automatic firearms declared to be military style semiautomatic firearms
For the purposes of the Arms Act 1983, the following firearms are declared to
be military style semi-automatic firearms:
(a) a semi-automatic firearm that is capable of being used in combination
with a detachable magazine (other than one designed to hold 0.22-inch
or less rimfire cartridges) that is capable of holding more than 5 cartridges:
(b) a semi-automatic firearm that is a shotgun and that is capable of being
used in combination with a detachable magazine that is capable of holding more than 5 cartridges.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top