soon a real possibility...Riots and all..

CommoFreq said:

In the US, low voter turnout over the years has been repeatedly blamed on laziness. In reality, I think people are starting to wake up to the fact that Democrats and Republicans are the same people in Washington.

Click to expand...

when was the last time you pulled the lever for a politician you loved and thought he was the answer to our problems. Me .....i don't even remember. I always seem to be voting for the lesser of two evils. Sound familiar
Maybe there isn't anyone out there like me.
I'm disgusted with my choices and I don't even want to hear the naysayers telling me I'm wasting my vote. He don't have a chance. I'm still gonna vote for who I think will closely represent me and the way I think. Maybe that's why turnout is so low. People probably don't feel anyone will represent their views. But hey... I'm just an ignorant country boy. But, consider whose leading in the GOP polls , top three are non politicians. Do you think the bigwigs will make the connection. No because these three are not part of the club. They havnt paid their dues. (that means their cut of the proceeds) ..... No , they will blindly hope for one more term to suckle on the teats of the starving sow until she dies of malnutrition, while trying to make sure they get theirs.
.

Yup Britain and America have turned the word DEMOCRACY into a dirty word.

Freedom, patriot, independence, sovereign, liberty, constitution, bill of rights, state rights, founding fathers, American, Christian.... Take your pick because they are all dirty words to the left!!!

The best thing the remaining quality US states like TX down south, KS in the middle and the NW tri states is to drive towards partial separation from the Federal US and to set up things like state controlled residency laws based around Christian cultures.

I don't wish to appear impolite but I get the feeling that todays US is not quite what you fought against us for in 1776, perhaps its time for another PEACEFUL revolution.

It's certainly not 1776

Given the economic state of affairs right now, it seems to me that the way they're thinking is, "if everything is going to crash anyway, a mass influx of migrants doesn't matter anymore".

[Northern Raider, post: 77455, member: 1695"]I don't wish to appear impolite but I get the feeling that todays US is not quite what you fought against us for in 1776, perhaps its time for another PEACEFUL revolution.[/QUOTE]

Personally I believe it is way past the point of a peaceful revolution. The only thing at this point that would change this crap is brass and hot lead. Peaceful would be shut down before it ever started.

Bill harrel trust me you are not alone. Its beginning to become painfully obvious most of america is becoming the land of the unrepresented.

Here in Northern Arkansas we're scheduled to get two batches of the refugees, one in Springdale, and the other in Springfield. A few thousand in each place, they are saying. But demographically, as America polarizes into red state vs. blue state and rural vs. urban, both coasts vs. the heartland, and religious and ethnic divisions widen, it looks like we're headed down the same path that Yugoslavia took in the 1990s.

some numbers from here;of all those that have come here as refugees,only 2800 are from Syria,rest from Irak,Somalia,Albainia,Bangladesh and Eritrea and they are all males,women and childeren make up around 15%,rest is men (not thta I call a man a man when he's not prepared to fight for his country but runs away like a coward)

jontte said:

some numbers from here;of all those that have come here as refugees,only 2800 are from Syria,rest from Irak,Somalia,Albainia,Bangladesh and Eritrea and they are all males,women and childeren make up around 15%,rest is men (not thta I call a man a man when he's not prepared to fight for his country but runs away like a coward)

Click to expand...

One thing I noticed is how many men I saw interviewed on the news had left their wife and kids over there. If the place was so bad, why in the hell would you abandon your family and leave them there!

Well, I agree, the majority of them I see look like military aged men, like a conquering army, instead of refugees. Makes you wonder how many of them are affiliated with ISIS. There was a book written a long time ago called 'The Camp Of The Saints' that prophecied the same kind of scenario that's unfolding now in Europe. IMO it's an invasion.

it is,nothing more nothing less, a clear invasion...and our governments are taken with their pants down..

I'm just glad geography is against them coming here. I have a feeling we'll be putting our NATO alliances to the test in the months and years to come, as some of these migrants show their true ISIS colors. Don't get me wrong, some are genuine refugees, but among them, the enemy lurks as well.

Putin called our bluff finally, so we can't just rely on the presence of ISIS to keep Syria unstable. He wants his pipeline, and he's tired of sitting on the sidelines to wait for it. Can't say I blame him. But, like Iraq, we went in without an endgame. Even if we enabled the rebels to oust Assad, who's to say the new leader wouldn't make the same deal with Putin? Nobody, that's who. In the meantime, we wait and allow the atrocities to mount, even though we could destroy ISIS' ability to war any time we wanted to.

There was a time I never thought I'd say this about a Russian, but I sure wish we could trade leaders with them, for my part.

hand on your heart,would you trade a weak president for a dictator??
okay he seems to be strong and all,but he's still a dictator. right now you have chance to elect someone else to the white house,you have the right to choose,you have the right to vote,do that,vote,just my thoughts from this side of the puddle living next door to that maniac.

As far as Im concerned Putin has the same target on his head as Osama did .
Obama has been the devider in chief , thats part of the lefts agenda . Stepping stones to bring about thier socialist bliss .

If I believed that the electoral process really still worked here, and that we did indeed have an opportunity every four years to start over again and try to do more than select the lesser evil from a short list of establishment approved cookie-cutter sycophants representing the two flip sides of the same coin, tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber, then I would NOT prefer a Putin to our system. But, since I believe that if voting could change anything they would already have made it illegal, I prefer a leader who at least doesn't want to open our borders, destroy the symbols of our heritage and history, remove our first and second amendments, AND embarrass us globally while making enemies and encouraging them to attack us. So, yep, I'd take a Putin over an Obama or a Jeb Bush. Nationalism over Socialism.

how about Trump??

He's a demagogue who has proven useful in pushing the dialectic a bit to the right and promoting discussion of the illegal immigrant invasion to an extent which none of the other establishment candidates might have preferred, but his purpose is as a steam pressure release valve to allow the discontented to vent and think that they have a real voice in the process, to try to keep them on board through the primary for one more election cycle, however demographically disenfranchised they may actually be.